Posted by aogSaturday, 31 October 2009 at 12:10 TrackBack Ping URL

Palin Warming

What do the irrelevancy of former Governor Sarah Palin and global warming climate change have in common? Both are of course totally beyond dispute, absolutely demonstrated by massive evidence, BUT it is necessary to make things up about the subjects to prove that case. Once again, Palin is smeared on no basis at all, with even the original article admitting this 30 paragraphs in, right at the end.

I am left wondering if this is just the flip side of the same crew making things up about President Obama, just with the sign flipped. I am left wondering about the genesis of such things — it seems very circular. Evidence is made up to support a conclusion, but where does that conclusion come from originally if the evidence is fabricated? It’s like a time travel paradox.

Comments — Formatting by Textile
pj Saturday, 31 October 2009 at 12:35

Where does the conclusion come from originally? Projection.

AVeryRoughRoadAhead Wednesday, 04 November 2009 at 15:35

Climate Bill Officially Dead for ‘09 | It’s Official: No Climate Bill This Year — By Kate Sheppard | Wed November 4, 2009

Hip hip Huzzah!! Hip hip Huzzah!! Hip hip Huzzah!!

If only we can keep this demon-spawned concept at bay for another coupla years, Great Depression II will put a final stake through its undead heart.

Post a comment