Negative endorsement
Posted by aogFriday, 08 July 2005 at 16:22 TrackBack Ping URL

I was reading an article at Reason on the bombings in London and WWIV in general when it occurred to me that if the attacks are, in fact, retaliation for the invasion of Iraq, that’s a good argument for the invasion. It’s the [CaliPhasist]s telling they are not in favor of the invasion. While not 100%, it’s still a good rule of thumb to favor things the Caliphascists don’t like.

Moreover, if you are fighting an enemy that’s concealed and mobile, the best tactic is to attack or conquer something that one’s enemy cannot permit. That forces them to come to battle and on your terms instead of theirs. Given the fervid rhetoric and bombing efforts, it seems that Iraq is such a thing and therefore, based on the Caliphascist efforts against it, we’d be fools to let it go.