Over at Harry’s Place there is a post about the evils of outsourcing, as stated by Senator John Kerry. While one wonders how his position is really different from that of the Luddites (whose jobs were outsourced to machines), it left me with the feeling that the defining characteristic of the Left is the lack of hope in human material progress despite the emphasis on material goods and their distribution.
While the historical record is clear that autarky and “job protection” trades off more future jobs for fewer present jobs (and frequently not even that), these are still the preferred solutions on the Left to any economic disruptions. There seems to be a strong preference for a good process that produces bad results than a bad process that produces good results. If you have no hope of future progress, then it might make sense to try and redistribute more equally what already exists. Still, it’s a bit odd that so called “progressives” don’t seem to have much faith in actual progress.
Of course, one of the key properties of the “good” process supported by the Left is that it delivers control over other people’s lives in to the hands of those running the process. The cynical among us might well wonder if that’s not the real goal and concern about “the people” is simply a cover story.
Ha! My cynicism is spreading.
Actually, I’m not sure one needs to have a cynical view of leftists as individuals in order to have this “cynical” view of the left. Greed for power does not have to be a major force in any single human being — say, it could be 2% of each individual’s motivation — but if it is the one thing that unites them, it can be the dominant driver of left-wing politics. Other motivations interfere with each other and the effects cancel, but the power motives build upon each other and end up driving the coalition.
One thing is certain though: the cynical view of the left has great predictive power. It’s hard to find a case where it doesn’t predict the left’s position.